Home / TrustPublic change record

Corrections

Confirmed factual changes are recorded here instead of being made silently.

Current log

Confirmed corrections
Date	Page	Previous	Current	Trigger
24 August 2026	/answers/nuisance-cart-goods-bag-shack	The pre-quest promise of the old resident’s shack was captured by no source other than WolfheartFPS, and WolfheartFPS was the only source for what the quest itself says.	Both are recorded by a second channel, Hommiepen, on a different day. The parting direction is “Fellow said he went south along the road”, not “Bellow”.	A mechanical cross-source search over every transcript in this repository — not a keyword sweep — surfaced a fifth recording of this conversation that ten previous readings had walked past. Three claims that had been carrying a single-source caveat did not need one. The page had also been printing a caption’s mis-hearing of a common word because only one channel had ever been read for that line.
24 August 2026	/answers/nuisance-cart-goods-bag-shack	The merchant who gives Nuisance was named Peaches.	The merchant is named Pichess.	No source ever supported “Peaches”. The developer changelog for Update 7 spells the name Pichess, and so does the written video description of the walkthrough this page cites as its route source. Machine captions render the name several ways — Pitches, Pitchus, Pess — and a caption spelling was never evidence. Four evidence cards had each cited one another for the spelling rather than the original source.
24 August 2026	/answers/lost-tome-theodorus-location	The merchant was named Peaches in the note on where names come from.	The merchant is named Pichess. Theodorus and Chi’Alani were re-checked against the same creator’s written title and description and are unchanged.	Same source review as the Nuisance page. This page vouched for three names in one sentence; two held and one did not.
24 August 2026	/answers/how-alchemy-and-brewing-work	Feeding an ingredient to a co-op partner teaches the effect to that player and not to you.	Handing an ingredient over does not teach the effect to the person who handed it over. Whether the partner who eats it learns anything is unsettled and no longer stated.	The single source is a two-player recording whose machine captions carry no speaker labels. Re-reading it showed that only the giver’s half was ever spoken aloud; the partner’s half had been inferred from the sentence structure. A mechanic phrased in the first and second person inverts completely depending on which player is talking, so the unevidenced half was withdrawn rather than kept at a lower grade.

Correction policy

Send the affected page and a public source to hello@laughlesssaintanswers.xyz. The evidence is reviewed against the page’s card and current game version. If it changes the answer, the page is updated, the change is entered here, and that page’s Checked date is updated at the same time.